User  Password
Search
Main Menu
· Home
· What do we believe?
· Contact us
· Recommended Links
TW Statements
· Declaration (Short Version)
· Declaration (In-depth)
· Profile of Ideal Leadership
· Stewardship Protocol
· The Cambridge Declaration
Useful Articles
· 10 Marks of a True Christian
· Creation versus Evolution
· Critics questions
· Ecumenism
· Ideal Biblical Leadership
· Marks of a False Church
· Marks of a Good Church
· Passion of the Christ Movie
· Pursuit of God
· Roman Catholicism
· Stewardship Protocol
· Super Apostles
· The "Faith" Movement
· Tithing
· Under Mind Control?
· Why Allah is not God
· Women in Eldership
· The Emerging Church
NZ Information
· Andrew Strom
· Bill Subritzky
· Breakthrough 2002
· Elim & Wellington TV
· Impact World Tour
· Paul Jackson
· Open Letter to Leaders (PN)
Leader Profiles
· Benny Hinn
· Bill Hybels
· Dr. Robert Schuller
· Norman Vincent Peale
· Rick Joyner
· T.B. Joshua
· Tony Campolo
· William Branham
The Passion of the Christ Movie
Posted by: AdminGood on Tuesday, May 11, 2004 - 06:59 PM
The Passion of the Christ Movie The Passion of the Christ movie by Mel Gibson has been hailed by some as the greatest evangelistic tool in history. But do such claims match the reality? Many may be surprised that a movie claimed by such people to be evangelistic has no mention of the need for repentance, or of salvation through faith alone. In fact the suffering of Christ is left largely unexplained.

This is because such Biblical and Evangelical concepts are not to be found in a movie that is essentially a Roman Catholic interpretation of the gospel account. Traditional Roman Catholicism sees the contemplation of Christ's physical suffering as meritorious - hence the Christ on crucifixes, flagellations and passion plays (of which this movie is an example) of traditional Roman Catholicism. This, and not primarily evangelism, is Mel's acknowledged goal for the movie. Contrast the explicit and dominating fixation of the flagellation of Christ in the movie - with the minimalist account in the Gospels (eg: John 19:1 Then Pilate took Jesus and had him flogged.) The New Testament emphasis is clearly on the spiritual suffering Christ on our behalf as the mediator of the New Covenant. Mel's emphasis on the flagellation plays down Scripture's emphasis on the cross and ressurection.

Sadly the result of Mel's movie will be increased confusion, for many 'Evangelicals' will simply assume that we preach the same gospel. Most Evangelicals watching the movie are unaware of the theological interpretations underlying all those extra scenes. Many will mistake these Roman Catholic elements for 'poetic licence' - but for Mel these extra scenes with Mary, the 14 Stations of the Cross, etc. are what he believes happened on the basis of Roman Catholic tradition and mysticism. Such unbiblical additions undermine and distort the scriptural account and therefore the Gospel itself. 'Evangelical' leaders have interviewed Mel and sung his praises - but how many have challenged him on his works of penance, Mariolatry, etc. and called him to trust in Christ alone for salvation? It seems that any sincere person who calls themselves a 'Christian' is one - yet even Jesus warns that such 'disciples' who trust in their works are not real disciples, and hence not saved (eg: Matthew 7:21-23)

Below are some links to articles that offer a more in-depth analysis of themovie:

Followup surveys show that the movie fails to have significant or lasting evangelistic effect. Its impact is primarily emotional and temporary. Eg:

A few excellent presentations of the Biblical meaning of the Passion, especially good for non-Christians who may have seen the movie:

By Chris Good
  [ More about The Passion of the Christ Movie ]      [ News by AdminGood ]      Printer friendly page   Send this story to a friend

Problems, Comments, Questions or Feedback regarding this Website - Please Click Here to send an email